A non interventionist foreign policy? http://elections2008forum.com/a-non-interventio... When you look at the problems with foreign intervention - problems such as the quagmire that is Iraq currently, or former issues like Vietnam, Nicaragua, Cambodia, Bosnia, virtually anywhere that the U.S. sends troops abroad there are lasting, serious repercussions. And for what? Often for the shallow gain of minor political maneuvering. Is it perhaps time for a non interventionist foreign policy?
I would rather endure all of the aforementioned problems and be an American than pretend everything around the world is a-okay and be conquered by the Soviets or the Chinese.+REPLY?
